The article examines the current military operations against Iran, emphasizing the precarious legal foundation under which these actions are being conducted. It particularly points out that international law prohibits the use of military force, referencing Article 2, No. 4 of the United Nations Charter, which underscores the necessity of refraining from any threats or use of force against the territorial integrity and political independence of sovereign nations. The piece reflects on the consequences of ignoring this principle and the potential crises that could arise from it.

The author stresses that Germany is wise to abstain from engaging in these questionable military actions, despite the seemingly noble intentions behind them. This stance is crucial as countries grapple with their legal and moral responsibilities in the face of international conflict. The article draws parallels to previous military engagements and poses questions regarding the legitimacy and justification of such actions under international law, particularly given the updated global political landscape since the failed military maneuvers of 2025.

Furthermore, the implications of such military interventions are profound, pointing towards a potential constitutional crisis within participating nations. As governments weigh the moral imperative to act against perceived threats with the legal constraints imposed by international law, the article calls for a critical reevaluation of the frameworks that govern military engagement and the impact of such decisions on constitutional integrity and human rights.