A coalition of Democratic attorneys general and governors from 24 US states has initiated a lawsuit against former President Donald Trump, aiming to prevent the implementation of a new round of tariffs. This legal action follows a decision by the Supreme Court that declared Trump's previous tariffs—referred to as 'liberation day' tariffs—illegal. The White House plans to introduce a 15% tariff on all imports, although these tariffs have not yet taken effect. The suit is being spearheaded by New York Attorney General Letitia James and involves a significant number of states, highlighting a broad coalition against Trump's trade policies.

The lawsuit contends that Trump lacks the legal authority to impose these tariffs under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, which was originally intended to address outdated monetary balance issues rather than allowing the president unfettered power over tariff impositions. The attorneys general argue that no president has historically utilized this section to enact tariffs, suggesting that Trump's actions may overstep legal boundaries. They are pushing for a refund of costs incurred from the existing tariffs, highlighting the financial impact of his policies on states that rely on imports.

If successful, this lawsuit could set a crucial precedent regarding presidential authority over trade policies and tariffs. The case will be filed in the US Court of International Trade, where it could ignite further legal debates around executive power and economic policy. The outcome may not only influence the current administration's approach to tariffs but may also shape the future of trade legislation and its implications for states across the country.