The Argentine Supreme Court has ruled in favor of Starbucks, stating that the coffee chain is not responsible for compensating a customer who was a victim of a robbery at one of its establishments in Belgrano. This decision overturns a previous ruling by the National Appeals Chamber in Civil Matters, which had condemned Starbucks to pay the victim 112,449 pesos plus interest for damages and losses incurred during the armed robbery. The court's ruling highlights the complexities involved in determining liability for criminal acts occurring within business premises.

In its decision, the Supreme Court emphasized that businesses are not automatically liable for criminal acts committed against their customers on their premises. It pointed out the need to establish a direct connection between the company's negligence and the incident in question. The court's ruling illustrates a significant legal precedent regarding the responsibilities of businesses towards their patrons when faced with criminal activities.

This case has implications for consumer rights and corporate responsibility in Argentina; it raises questions about the extent to which restaurants and retail establishments should be held accountable for crimes committed in their vicinity. The ruling could influence future case law and affect how other businesses approach security measures and their legal obligations in protecting customers from violent incidents.