The Guardian conducted a survey among Americans regarding the recent military actions taken by the United States and Israel against Iran following a significant strike on February 28th, which resulted in the deaths of numerous civilians and US service members. The feedback reflected a predominant disapproval of the actions, with many respondents acknowledging the complex political situation in Iran and the need for regime change but questioning the morality of military intervention. Iraj Roshan, a US citizen and retired cardiologist originally from Iran, highlighted the power of narrative in warfare, indicating a nuanced understanding of the implications surrounding such conflicts. In light of this military intervention, many Americans recalled statements made by former President Donald Trump, who was critical of US military interventions abroad during his presidency. Trump's views aimed at reducing foreign entanglements resonated with a segment of the American public that harbors skepticism towards military actions overseas, especially those that come at the cost of civilian lives. The current sentiment towards the strikes indicates a growing wariness among the populace about the effectiveness and moral justification of armed conflict in international relations. The responses collected by the Guardian showcase a broader dialogue in the US regarding foreign policy, military engagements, and the ethical considerations of intervening in other sovereign nations. As the situation in Iran evolves, it is clear that public opinion is increasingly influenced by a desire for accountability, transparency, and a more restrained approach to involvement in overseas conflicts, suggesting that the debate surrounding these actions is far from over.