In this commentary, Michael Higgins evaluates Prime Minister Mark Carney’s recent statements regarding the complexities of Canada’s position in global affairs, especially in relation to the military actions taken by the U.S. and Israel against Iran. Higgins argues that Carney’s mantra, "we take the world as it is, not as we wish it to be," serves as an easy way to navigate the difficult decisions that leaders must make in international politics. It allows Carney to maintain a neutral or vague stance that simultaneously supports and opposes various sides of a conflict.

Higgins stresses that while Carney's approach might seem to reflect a realpolitik understanding of international relations, it actually signifies a kind of moral failure. The slogan captures a reluctance to engage with the deeper ethical implications of Canada’s foreign policy choices. In light of the recent U.S.-Israel military actions, this philosophical stance raises critical questions about Canada's true position and commitment, which are left unclear and inconsistent.

The piece goes on to illustrate how such ambiguity complicates Canada’s international relations and moral standing. As Carney oscillates between expressing full support and qualified regret regarding military actions, Higgins calls for a more principled stance that does not shy away from the difficult realities of warfare and diplomacy. This moral abrogation not only confuses domestic and international audiences but could also have significant implications for Canada’s role on the world stage.