The article explores the decline of rational discourse in Argentine society, linking it to personal experiences within families and the challenges of parenting in an emotionally charged environment. It highlights how the digital revolution and social media have transformed not only information consumption but also how individuals feel, decide, and confront conflicts. This transformation has led to a public sphere dominated by emotional climates where reactions replace deliberation and alignment replaces evaluation.

Furthermore, the article suggests that this emotional landscape has significant implications for the construction of power in Argentina. It is argued that the current climate is conducive to the rise of populist movements—both left and right—which promise simple solutions to complex problems and capitalize on negative emotions as tools for political cohesion. The author emphasizes that such populist leaders do not seek to integrate diverse perspectives but rather use divisiveness as a means of consolidating their support and power.

Ultimately, the piece warns of the dangers posed by this trend towards emotional politics, where insult and reaction become staples of public discourse, eroding the foundations of democratic deliberation and the ability to engage in constructive debate. It calls for a reevaluation of how citizens interact with both each other and political systems to safeguard democracy against the forces of simplification and emotional manipulation.