War in the Middle East: an international analyst downplayed the attack in Sri Lanka and compared the U.S. to the Roman Empire
International analyst Mookie Tenembaum discussed the implications of a U.S. submarine's attack on an Iranian warship near Sri Lanka, suggesting it reflects the weakening of international law.
During a recent segment on LN+, international analyst Mookie Tenembaum commented on a significant maritime incident where a U.S. submarine attacked the Iranian warship IRIS Dena off the coast of Sri Lanka, resulting in at least 87 deaths and numerous disappearances. Though the event was tragic, Tenembaum categorized it as peripheral to the broader conflict unfolding in the Middle East, suggesting that the sinking of the ship does not directly influence the ongoing wars in that region but rather highlights the complexities of international warfare.
Tenembaum underscored the legality surrounding the incident, pointing out that the attack occurred in international waters and not in a designated exclusion zone. This raised questions about the current state of international law, which he argued lacks effective enforcement, noting that for international law to be viable, it must have associated penalties which, in his view, is often absent. He emphasized that the perceived power of the law is undermined by the inability to impose consequences on states that violate it.
Additionally, Tenembaum drew a historical parallel between the actions of the United States and the Roman Empire, insinuating that U.S. foreign policy reflects a similar trajectory of imperial overreach. His comments suggest that as global tensions escalate, particularly with nations like Iran and Turkey, the U.S. must navigate a precarious international landscape characterized by desperation and hostility towards American influence. This analysis positions the current maritime attack within a larger discussion of geopolitical strategies and the relevance of international policies today.