In a recent interview, former commander of the Latvian National Armed Forces (NBS) Juris Maklakovs raised concerns over the potential for extensive ground operations by the US and Israel in Iran. He highlighted that such a military campaign could turn out to be much more complicated than past conflicts, such as those in Korea and Vietnam. According to Maklakovs, while air campaigns can be effectively executed, the absence of ground troops makes any substantial change in Iran’s power dynamics highly unlikely. This reflects a strategic perspective that emphasizes the importance of troop presence in achieving military objectives.

Maklakovs also commented on the growing speculation regarding the US's potential use of Iranian Kurdish groups to facilitate regime change in Tehran. He noted the challenges associated with arming and sending Kurdish fighters, suggesting that while this may be feasible, it would not be a straightforward operation. His insights underline the complexities involved in the geopolitical dynamics of the region and the risks of engaging non-state actors in military operations. This articulates a broader caution about the implications of military intervention in Iran.

The expert's assessment serves as a reminder of the historical precedents that shape current military strategies and the high human costs involved in such interventions. The commentary arrives at a time of heightened tensions between Iran and Western powers, as discussions about military involvement continue to unfold. Maklakovs’ perspective urges consideration of the long-term consequences of military actions and calls for a reevaluation of strategies that might lead to unintended outcomes in the volatile landscape of Middle Eastern politics.