After the court announced its decision regarding the Golden Dawn trial, the defense attorneys of the convicted members requested that mitigating circumstances be recognized. They argued on various grounds, including prior lawful conduct, good behavior after the offense, unreasonable duration of the trial, and the defendants' adolescent age at the time of the incidents. The legal proceedings concerning these requests are expected to continue, and there is a possibility that the presiding prosecutor will also present recommendations before the conclusion.

One notable figure in this case is Ilias Kasidiaris, who has been referred to as the only leader of a criminal organization with a clean criminal record. His attorney, Vasso Pandazi, emphasized that he exemplifies the mitigating circumstance of good behavior after the crime, underscoring that this justification should weigh favorably in their requests for leniency. The first-instance court had previously acknowledged mitigating circumstances, particularly regarding the post-teenage age of some defendants, which has implications for their sentences and future rehabilitation prospects.

The trial has drawn considerable public attention due to the underlying political and social issues in Greece associated with the far-right Golden Dawn party. The acknowledgment of mitigating circumstances could influence future cases and the perception of justice regarding politically motivated offenses. As such, the ongoing legal developments will be closely monitored by both the public and legal experts, reflecting broader societal concerns about extremism and accountability in Greece.