The article presents an interview with historian Jakub Drábik, who addresses the current state of fascism in Slovakia, particularly focusing on its new manifestations that do not conform to traditional symbols like brown shirts or swastikas. Instead, contemporary fascists are depicted as utilizing arguments around freedom of speech and national traditions to justify extremist behavior. This development comes against a backdrop of democratic erosion in Slovakia, underscored by a recent report that categorizes the country as nearing an autocratic regime, with only Hungary faring worse among EU states.

In January, a group of lawmakers from the Slovak National Party proposed amendments to the criminal code aimed at reducing penalties for extremist crimes, igniting significant backlash from the anti-fascist movement in Slovakia. The protesters argued that failure to address fascism now would result in more significant problems in the future, reflecting a growing concern about the government's efforts to downplay hate crimes. Following public outcry, the lawmakers retracted their proposal, indicating plans to introduce a modified version in cooperation with other coalition members, highlighting the tension between extremist ideologies and democratic values.

Drábik's insights provoke critical reflections on the differences between democracy and autocracy and challenge readers to recognize the subtleties of contemporary fascist rhetoric. By intertwining historical perspectives with current events, the interview raises vital questions about the health of democracy in Slovakia and the necessity for vigilance against extremism in all its forms.