Mar 4 • 02:23 UTC 🇰🇷 Korea Hankyoreh (KR)

Is Trump's claim that war will last forever real? Estimated spending of 1.15 trillion won in the first 24 hours of the attack

The article discusses the significant military expenditures by the U.S. during the first day of military operations, estimating costs to reach approximately $779 million.

The U.S. has mobilized over 20 military weapon systems for the recent attack, which includes B-2 stealth bombers, F-22, F-35, and F-16 fighter jets, as well as aircraft carriers and various missile defense systems. The Central Command (CENTCOM) confirmed the deployment of such advanced military assets, which raises concerns regarding the costs associated with sustaining military operations. The article estimates that this initial operation could have cost at least $779 million, which includes various expenditures such as the B-2 operations and Tomahawk cruise missile munitions.

Moreover, the article highlights that the U.S. expenditures are a fraction of the total defense budget, which could signal the economic burden of such military engagements. A senior research analyst from the Stimson Center noted the complexities of calculating military costs, emphasizing the implications of maintaining an extensive arsenal and the financial strain of current military operations. With Israel reported to have lost several fighter jets in operations, the overall expenses could escalate significantly.

The implications of these military expenses are substantial, particularly in a context where adversaries like Iran utilize low-cost drones against high-cost air defense systems. As the pace and frequency of operations continue, continuing at the current rate could lead to escalating costs that the Trump administration might find increasingly untenable, raising questions about the feasibility of prolonged military engagement. The balance between military effectiveness and economic sustainability remains a critical issue for policymakers advocating for military readiness.

📡 Similar Coverage