Victims and relatives of terrorism victims in Greece are voicing their anger over the decision by journalist Alexis Papachelas to give convicted terrorist Dimitris Koutoumanos a platform in a documentary about the November 17 terrorist organization. Several groups, including the association supporting terrorism victims, denounced this decision, stating that it is the first time in decades that a media outlet has provided airtime to a remorseless killer associated with such a notorious group. They argue that such exposure serves only to glorify Koutoumanos and continues a disturbing legacy of violence.

In their joint statement, representatives like Thanos Axarlian underscored the potential dangers of normalizing the voice of convicted terrorists in public discourse. They emphasized that Koutoumanos, who has committed heinous acts throughout his time with the November 17 group, is being granted unwanted publicity that could inspire others who share his ideology. The documentary was particularly criticized for not only bringing him back into public attention but also for potentially reopening old wounds for the victims’ families, who have spent decades grappling with the aftermath of these crimes.

The controversy revolves around the media's responsibility in handling narratives of violence and terror, raising questions about ethical journalism and the impact of sensationalism on society. Victims are alarmed that Koutoumanos, through this kind of exposure, might garner a following or support from individuals who admire his actions. The debate on this topic exemplifies the broader conflict in media about balancing free speech and the potential glorification of terroristic acts.