In a response published in Dagens Nyheter, Caroline Thelning, founder of the network Kvinnokraft 4.0, argues against the integration of religious norms into state activities, specifically addressing the context of Ramadan. Thelning challenges the notion presented by Rahman Mridha that Ramadan should receive the same recognition as Christmas in Sweden, stating that the state's role should not involve endorsing or integrating specific religious practices into public life. She emphasizes that while every individual has the right to observe their religious practices, the state must remain neutral to uphold its legal principles regarding equality and non-discrimination.

The discussion touches on the broader themes of religious freedom and the importance of keeping state functions separate from religious influences. Thelning notes that while recognizing and respecting different faiths is essential, doing so should not compromise the foundational legal principles that govern equality between genders and other societal norms. This perspective raises questions about what role, if any, the government should play in recognizing religious observances and suggests that the implications of such recognition can have significant effects on societal equality.

In concluding her argument, Thelning reaffirms her belief that integrating religious observances into state behaviors could potentially lead to conflicts with Sweden’s commitment to gender equality and rights. She suggests that while society should be inclusive, it is vital to critically evaluate how such inclusivity manifests in state interactions with religious groups. Thelning’s response is indicative of ongoing debates within Sweden regarding the balance between religious freedom and the principles of a secular state.