A. Skaisgirytė, in a recent interview with Žinių radijas, discussed the recent military strikes against Iran, stating that the situation had been brewing for a long time. She emphasized that negotiations between the US and Iran regarding nuclear arms and missile production had been ongoing for months, with discussions continuing until the last minute. According to Skaisgirytė, the failure of Iran to adhere to US demands to cease uranium enrichment and halt its nuclear weapons program left no alternative but to take preventive action.

Skaisgirytė articulated that the actions taken by the US and Israel were justified and seen as necessary. She characterized the strikes as an inevitable response to Iran's inaction, conveying a sense that diplomatic efforts had been exhausted. This perspective mirrors a growing sentiment among those who believe that military intervention is sometimes required to address perceived threats from nations that do not conform to international expectations.

The implications of Skaisgirytė's remarks extend beyond just the immediate conflict, reflecting broader geopolitical dynamics in the region. As tensions continue, the support for military action against Iran highlights a division in international opinion about how to effectively manage nuclear proliferation and regional security. Therefore, her comments suggest an inclination towards a more aggressive stance in foreign policy when diplomacy fails.