The article from FAZ analyzes the critical state of international law concerning tyrannical regimes, particularly focusing on Iran. It posits that while the collapse of brutal dictatorships aligns with the principles of the UN Charter, the methods used to enact such changes must adhere to international legal standards. The author criticizes the tendency to selectively apply principles of international law, highlighting that mere vocal support for these standards is insufficient when violations occur without accountability.

Historically, the Iranian regime has faced significant scrutiny for its blatant human rights abuses, with the author citing troubling practices such as torture and the suppression of women's rights. These violations are framed not just as internal issues of the state but as matters that demand international attention and intervention due to their severe nature. The discussion challenges readers to reconsider how the international community should react to such regimes, advocating for a consistent application of international law.

In conclusion, the piece addresses the broader implications of selective outrage over international law violations, warning that inconsistent engagement only serves to undermine genuine efforts to uphold human rights. A call to action is made for a more principled and comprehensive approach to addressing human rights abuses globally, with a particular focus on ensuring that both legal frameworks and moral obligations guide international responses to tyranny.