The exclusion of former patients of gynaecologist Simon Gordon from an independent review at Epworth Hospital has sparked significant anger among those impacted. These women, who underwent surgeries for what was deemed 'severe' endometriosis, are enraged to learn that the hospital has not invited them to provide their testimonies or insights during the review process. The situation has arisen following serious allegations that Gordon performed unnecessary surgical procedures despite pathology reports indicating minimal signs of endometriosis.

In light of previously reported allegations from ABC's Four Corners, which detailed claims against Gordon's practices, Epworth Hospital has initiated a review of its clinical governance arrangements. This external review is led by two experts from outside the state, highlighting a significant response to the controversial surgical practices that have come under scrutiny. However, the terms of reference for this review are still being finalized, raising concerns about the thoroughness of the investigation, especially without the involvement of the women directly affected.

The situation not only reflects on individual patient experiences but also raises broader questions about patient rights and hospital accountability in cases of potential medical malpractice. The outcry from former patients emphasizes the importance of including affected individuals in reviews that directly impact their health and wellbeing, indicating a need for hospitals to enhance transparency and communication with patients in such sensitive scenarios.