Kang Jun-man, a professor emeritus at Jeonbuk National University, discusses the phenomenon of public figures using the so-called 'traitor frame' in political discourse. This frame dismisses valid criticisms and focuses solely on attacking those who oppose one's views. The article highlights how political leaders, particularly in South Korea, invoke this frame to undermine their critics without addressing the substantial arguments against their positions. In particular, it points out that the former Daegu Mayor Hong Joon-pyo has been vocal in condemning perceived betrayals while evading the hard questions that arise in political loyalty, especially during controversial events like the martial law enforced by President Yoon Seok-yeol.

The piece further explores the ethical implications of loyalty in politics, suggesting that the public has the right to question whether loyalty to a leader, despite actions taken that may constitute betrayal of public trust, is justified. Kang questions why individuals like Hong Joon-pyo choose to wield the concept of betrayal as a weapon to attack dissenting politicians who stood against actions like the martial law, without engaging in a meaningful discussion about the integrity of these actions. The rhetoric employed, imbued with strongly negative connotations about betrayal, leaves little room for nuanced conversation and demonstrates a troubling trend in political discourse that prioritizes personal loyalty over public accountability.

Overall, the column calls for a more thoughtful engagement with political criticism, urging public figures to confront dissent rigorously rather than resorting to dismissive insults. This approach not only detracts from serious debate but also erodes the fundamental principles of justice and accountability that are vital in a democratic society.