In a recent social media post, Finnish violinist Linda Lampenius and singer Pete Parkkonen expressed their strong disapproval of Israel's involvement in the Eurovision Song Contest, which they deemed an inappropriate decision amidst the ongoing humanitarian issues in Palestine. They articulated their views shortly before the Eurovision final, highlighting the moral implications of allowing Israel to participate in an event often viewed purely through the lens of entertainment. Their stance indicates a growing trend where public figures in the arts are increasingly vocal about political issues that intersect with their platforms.

The response to their remarks on Iltalehti's Facebook page has been notably polarized, with many commentators urging Lampenius and Parkkonen to keep politics separate from music. Some users have expressed frustration over the musicians' political stance, suggesting that Eurovision should focus solely on the artistry and avoid controversial political discourse. Comments like "What if musicians just focused on their music?" illustrate a desire among certain segments of the audience for a clear division between artistic performances and political statements.

This incident underscores the ongoing debate about the role of artists in political discourse, especially in light of sensitive international issues. While some supporters commend Lampenius and Parkkonen for using their influence to speak out, critics argue that musical platforms should not be intertwined with political activism, demonstrating a complex relationship between art, politics, and public perception in contemporary society.