A former royal protection officer has shared insights into the often unsavory dynamics of working for Prince Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, revealing that staff had a nickname for him which was deemed too crude for public airing. This adds to a series of claims about his entitled demeanor and behavior, which many employees found difficult to tolerate.

According to this bodyguard, Andrew's interactions with his staff were marked by a sense of entitlement, believing they existed solely to serve him without questioning his demands. Reports suggest that his temper could flare dramatically if his wishes were not complied with, leading to outbursts and tantrums that made him quite unpopular among his employees, despite being the Queen's favored son.

Renowned royal author Andrew Lownie supported these claims, emphasizing that Andrew's behavior contributed to a toxic environment among the royal staff. This revelation not only sheds light on the inner workings of the British royal family but also raises questions about the treatment of those who serve them and the broader implications of privilege within such establishments.