Swedish Chief Prosecutor Lennart Guné recently commented on the ongoing investigation into the murder of former Prime Minister Olof Palme, expressing doubt that anyone will ever be convicted for the crime. Guné, during a press conference in December, stood firm on his decision not to reopen the investigation, stating that the integrity of the evidence connected to Palme's coat had diminished, which raised further criticisms of the case.

Experts have suggested that advancements in DNA technology could potentially reveal traces of the killer who was in contact with Palme at the time of his murder. Notably, Marie Allen, a professor of forensic genetics at Uppsala University, emphasized that modern techniques may indeed allow for extraction of significant evidence. However, Guné has maintained that without substantial grounds or new evidence, reopening the investigation would be unwarranted.

This ongoing discussion around the Palme case highlights the continuing public interest and the questions surrounding its unsolved status, more than three decades after the assassination. Guné's stance reveals the complexities facing investigators concerning the limitations of existing evidence and modern forensic science, leaving the path forward uncertain despite advances in technology that could offer new insights.