The absence of skull fractures does not rule out aggression in the case of the dog Orelha, specialists say
Experts indicate that the lack of skull fractures in the case of the dog Orelha does not exclude the possibility of aggression; the cause of death remains unclear.
In the ongoing investigation surrounding the dog Orelha, who was found dead in early January on Praia Brava in Florianópolis, specialists assert that the absence of visible skull fractures does not eliminate the possibility of aggression. Although the forensic report following the dog's exhumation could not determine a specific cause of death, it also did not rule out the presence of trauma. The analysis was limited as the body was in a state of skeletonization, making it difficult to assess soft tissue injuries that may have occurred prior to or during the dog's death.
The forensic findings indicated no fractures or injuries that could be attributed to human actions, contradicting claims circulating on social media about an alleged nail being driven into the dog's head. However, the specialists cautioned that the lack of fractures should not be interpreted as proof of the absence of cranioencephalic trauma, as many severe injuries can occur without any identifiable marks on the bones and can still result in fatal outcomes.
This case has sparked considerable public interest and concern regarding animal welfare, prompting discussions about the need for stricter laws and protections for animals. As the investigation continues, the authorities are under pressure to uncover more information about Orelha's death and to ensure that accountability measures are put in place for any potential act of violence against animals in the region.