In a recent discussion, former Supreme Court judge Eerik Kergandberg and legal scholar Raul Narits shed light on the current state of Estonia's legal system. They emphasize that the existing body of laws, which they describe as a mountain of legislation, poses significant challenges for both legal professionals and the general public. The accumulation of complex legal texts can lead to confusion and misinterpretation, hampering the functioning of justice and effectively serving the needs of the society it is meant to protect.

Kergandberg and Narits argue that one of the root causes of these issues is the political landscape, where legislative processes can become overwhelmed by various interests and pressures. They propose that if politicians could be held back or guided to focus more on meaningful reforms rather than political expediency, there might be an opportunity to simplify and humanize the laws that govern citizens. This call for political restraint emphasizes the need for a more rational approach to lawmaking that considers the impact on individuals rather than merely the political climate.

The implications of their discussion resonate with broader concerns about the effectiveness and accessibility of legal systems worldwide. By advocating for a more streamlined and humane legal framework, Kergandberg and Narits not only highlight Estonia's legal challenges but also contribute to an ongoing global conversation about the need for more just and comprehensible legal systems. Their insights suggest that meaningful reform is possible but will require a collective effort to prioritize clarity, fairness, and humanity in law.