The article, written by Cláudio Hebdô for Folha, poses a rhetorical question regarding Minister Gilmar Mendes, suggesting that there might be concerns about his influence in the Brazilian judiciary and political arena. It reflects on whether his actions could be perceived as suppressive, particularly in relation to key political figures like Davi Alcolumbre.

In this context, the piece indicates that Mendes, a prominent figure in the Supreme Federal Court of Brazil, has been at the center of various controversies involving his judicial rulings and public statements. The narrative suggests that his legal authority may be perceived as overwhelming or stifling to dissenting voices within the political landscape. This highlights the ongoing tension between judicial authority and political power in Brazil, especially as various actors navigate the complexities of governance and public policy.

Furthermore, the hint at Alcolumbre's potential endorsement of Mendes suggests a deeper political calculation at play, indicating that alliances and enmities are dynamic and can significantly shape Brazil's legal and political narrative. The article reflects broader themes regarding the role of judicial figures in democratic societies and raises questions about balance between law and politics, especially in polarized environments.