Diego Armesto, a constitutional lawyer, recently discussed the inconsistencies and potential harms of Argentina's proposed labor reform. On the program LN+, he expressed that the reform is not only regressive but is structured to benefit everyone involved in the negotiation—government, unions, and businesses—except for the workers themselves. Armesto emphasized that this law does not create jobs but rather establishes a framework that serves other interests.

He argued that the labor reform represents a significant shift away from protections traditionally afforded to workers, suggesting that those employed in the private sector may suffer under the new regulations. He lamented that workers have been excluded from the negotiation process, leading to legislation that does not consider their rights or needs. Armesto's claim that "nobody has bothered to read the legislation thoroughly" highlights concerns about the public's understanding of the implications of such reforms.

As discussions continue in the Senate, Armesto's insights reflect a growing unease among legal experts and labor advocates regarding the future of worker rights in Argentina. His comments raise questions about the motivations behind the reform and its potential long-term effects on the labor market and employee welfare. The criticism points to a need for greater transparency and worker representation in discussions that fundamentally alter the landscape of employment rights in the country.