The article explores the ongoing political battle in Poland regarding the SAFE legislation. It highlights that nearly 60% of Poles support President Nawrocki's signature on the bill, as noted by political analyst Kolanko. However, there is strategic maneuvering at play, with Prime Minister Tusk pushing for a presidential veto, which he sees as a way to polarize the political landscape further, suggesting that Tusk's support pressures the president to oppose the bill.

Kolanko elaborates on the implications of a potential veto, arguing that it would be politically detrimental for President Nawrocki. He suggests that the government would exploit such a veto to showcase the success of their funding initiatives in Polish industry, undermining any political gains the president could achieve by not signing the bill. The conversation among analysts reflects the broader tactics employed by political figures in managing public sentiment and legislative power within a polarized environment.

The article also points to the absurdity of the opposition’s narrative, as pointed out by Szułdrzyński, who emphasizes the economic benefits that SAFE would bring to the Polish industry. This perspective is crucial in understanding the stakes involved in the political discourse surrounding the SAFE legislation, as it intertwines economic interests with strategic political gamesmanship.