Fredrik Kopsch, the chief economist at the Swedish think tank Timbro, has voiced strong criticism of the government's handling of migration and deportations, particularly highlighting the anger among citizens regarding recent decisions. Kopsch notes that the public did not foresee the severe consequences of a stricter migration policy, which they believed would not involve such drastic measures as deporting well-established individuals in Sweden.

Since the start of the year, numerous cases of deportations have sparked intense debates among voters and politicians alike. Kopsch emphasizes that citizens are understandably upset as they see the troubling impact on personal lives, especially when it comes to deporting individuals who have been part of the community for years. His statements reflect a growing disconnect between the government’s narrative during the election and the harsh realities under the new policy.

The discussion around immigration has evolved significantly, from a focus on limiting entries to grappling with the moral and social implications of deportations. Kopsch argues that the electorate did not agree to the current situation, and the government's failure to communicate this shift has led to widespread frustration. The current immigration discourse is critical as it directly impacts political sentiment and future policy directions in Sweden.