In the run-up to the municipal elections in Lyon, Jean-Michel Aulas, a prominent figure in local politics, made a commitment to include 50% candidates from the 'civil society' in his campaign lists. However, while the movement 'Cœur lyonnais' recorded this promise numerically with around thirty politically active individuals out of 73 names on the list, the initial candidates in preferential positions are mostly seasoned politicians from the right and center. This situation raises questions about the actual representation of civil society in the municipal council.

The predominant listing of established political figures in top spots undermines the initial objective of achieving greater representation from outside traditional political circles, which many voters might have hoped for. This strategic move appears to be aligned with Aulas's broader goal of ensuring electoral success rather than genuinely diversifying the representation within the municipal council. The implications of this could lead to disillusionment among constituents who are seeking authentic change and representation.

As electoral campaigns continue, Aulas's approach highlights the tension between political promises and the realities of candidate selection. The focus on established politicians in significant positions suggests a prioritization of electability over the intended inclusion of new voices from civil society, which could ultimately impact voter perceptions and turnout in the upcoming elections.