The article highlights the significant challenges posed by Mexican drug cartels, specifically in regions like Puerto Vallarta and Jalisco, where cartel violence and influence have notably surged. It argues that, according to the U.S. Constitution, President Trump possesses the authority and responsibility to combat these non-state actors that exert control over large parts of Mexican territory. With cartels effectively functioning as sovereign entities, it emphasizes that recent U.S. immigration crises represent not mere migration but an invasion, warranting decisive action from the government.

Furthermore, the narrative frames Trump's prior successes in securing the Southern border as evidence of potential effectiveness in combating cartel power. It underscores how the proliferation of dangerous drugs, such as fentanyl, poses severe threats not just to the U.S. populace but to national security. By invoking a sense of urgency about the ongoing crisis, the article insinuates that failure to act against these cartels could lead to further destabilization, both domestically and internationally, accentuating the seriousness of the situation as one requiring immediate military or legislative response.

In its conclusion, the article suggests that American policymakers must recognize the historical precedents and legal basis for taking aggressive action against Mexican cartels. It raises questions about the implications of such actions for U.S.-Mexico relations, suggesting that the complex dynamics of sovereignty and law enforcement may necessitate a reevaluation of current strategies in dealing with drug cartels, especially under the backdrop of Trump's administration's policies and historical actions towards border security and drug-related violence.