U.S. President Donald Trump is reportedly moving towards military intervention in Iran, having received three possible attack scenarios from U.S. Central Command. These developments were reported by ABC and Axios, indicating that military officials believe a primary role in any potential attack should be played by Israel. The urgency of addressing Iran's alleged missile development capabilities that could threaten the United States has been underscored within Trump's circle, according to various sources.

One notable figure in this discourse is General Dan Caine, a senior military officer, who cautioned Trump about the possible consequences of such an action. He warned that an attack on Iran might lead to an extended conflict and could significantly deplete U.S. missile defense stocks, raising concerns about the military's preparedness and resource allocation. This internal debate within Trump's administration highlights the complexities and potential ramifications of military decisions in a volatile region.

Despite these warnings, Trump is advocating for a decisive response to perceived threats from Iranian missile programs, emphasizing the need to act against any developments that could empower Iran's military capabilities. The potential for increased U.S. and Israeli military coordination exists, raising questions about the broader implications for regional stability and international relations in the Middle East.