In a recent experiment by secret.london, two commuters took the Tube on one of London's shortest routes, from Marylebone to Baker Street, which lasts only 57 seconds, while a third individual opted to walk the same distance. The results highlighted an interesting trend; despite the Tube's efficiency in many cases, for this brief journey, the time it took to navigate the station systems—including ticket scanning and waiting for the train—overwhelmed the actual travel time on the Tube. Thus, walking became the quicker option.

This finding has sparked debate among Londoners about the practicality of using the Tube for very short distances. Many commuters often find themselves facing similar frustrations during their daily travels, having to endure long waits and escalator rides for journeys that could be completed on foot in a fraction of the time. London's extensive network of public transport is generally reliable, but this experiment shines a light on certain inefficiencies, particularly on short trips.

Furthermore, the experiment’s results reveal broader implications for urban transport planning in cities like London. As cities aim to reduce congestion and promote environmentally friendly travel options, encouraging walking for short distances may be a beneficial strategy. This is particularly relevant in an age where many are looking to decrease their reliance on public transport due to ongoing health concerns and the desire for more exercise.