The article highlights the growing divisiveness in contemporary society, where differing opinions have transformed into entrenched positions, and where extremism and radicalism thrive on fear and simplification of complex realities. The author warns that when people suggest that 'everyone is the same' or categorize individuals into 'good' and 'bad', it signifies a lack of true leadership and a manipulative narrative. Such statements are not only misleading but detrimental to constructive dialogue.

Drawing from personal experiences in engaging with communities and institutions, the author underscores a crucial lesson: the intricacy of reality surpasses any radical discourse. The piece argues that generalizations are the language of those reluctant to deeply consider issues but eager to persuade others. The appeal of extremism lies in its ability to provide simple solutions to multifaceted problems, presenting the world in binary terms of right versus wrong, leading to quick fixes and clear villains.

This dichotomy holds a particular attraction for young people, who often seek identity and belonging. The author emphasizes the need for nuanced discussions that embrace complexity over polarized views. The piece calls for a reconsideration of how society talks about these issues, urging a shift away from radical simplifications towards a more thoughtful engagement with reality, which could foster understanding rather than division.