The head of the Anti-Corruption Commission in Estonia, reflecting on the investigation into Enefit Green, has expressed disappointment regarding the commission's limited powers in obtaining crucial information. The Legal Chancellor has determined that the commission does not have the direct authority to access a list of individuals who were aware of the plans for the state-owned Enefit Green to leave the stock exchange. This lack of access to information is seen as a significant barrier to the investigation's depth and effectiveness.

The commission's leader argues that without being able to identify and question those who leaked information for illegal profit, many underlying issues may remain unexplored. This raises concerns about the potential for ongoing corruption and unethical conduct within the state-owned enterprise and among its associated parties. The leader's comments highlight a broader issue of accountability and transparency within governmental processes, particularly regarding companies that interface closely with the state.

Furthermore, this situation could set a precedent for future investigations into state-owned enterprises and their governance. If the commission is unable to adequately address these dilemmas in the Enefit Green case, it may hinder public trust in the integrity of anti-corruption measures in Estonia. The implications of these developments warrant careful attention from both the government and civil society, as the effectiveness of oversight mechanisms remains crucial for maintaining democratic principles and the rule of law.