The article explores the various perspectives on the role of democracy in Mexico's ongoing political transformation under President López Obrador's administration. The government posits that democracy should facilitate the transformation of reality, eliminate privileges, and address corruption and inequality. In this view, the administration sees traditional democratic processes, such as congressional deliberations and media criticism, as distractions from its mission of progressive change, suggesting that these elements are impediments to swift progress.

Conversely, proponents of liberal democracy emphasize the importance of democratic processes as a means to control power and uphold the Constitution and the separation of powers. They argue that democracy should serve as a framework to protect citizens from potential abuses of power by the government. This tension highlights a fundamental debate within Mexican society about the purpose and functioning of democracy, specifically in the context of a government aiming for significant change but perceived by some as potentially authoritarian.

As these differing views collide, the implications for Mexico's political future are significant. The government's approach may lead to a restructuring of political norms and an emphasis on direct representation, but it also raises concerns among liberal democracy advocates who fear that sidelining democratic institutions and processes may erode the checks and balances essential to prevent government overreach. The outcome of this ideological conflict will shape the ensuing political landscape in Mexico.