The financial repercussions of the Master conglomerate's default remain largely uncertain, with speculations about recoverable assets and ongoing assessments of liabilities. Notably, the Brazilian Credit Guarantee Fund (FGC) is set to cover losses amounting to R$ 40.6 billion solely for bank-related clients, with compensation limits placed on various account types. However, many losses will not be covered, indicating that the overall damage could exceed R$ 50 billion, and raising concerns about where the missing funds disappeared and who may have benefited from illicit banking operations.

The article raises critical questions about the accountability of those involved, particularly concerning the role of prominent political and judicial figures in influencing the situation surrounding Master. Daniel Vorcaro and his associates appear to have significant connections within both the political arena and the judiciary, prompting inquiries about what vested interests might exist in obfuscating the investigation. Specific mention is made of attempts to obstruct investigatory processes, illustrated by interventions from figures such as Supreme Federal Court Minister Dias Toffoli and members of the Union's Court of Accounts, which further complicates the situation and suggests a high level of corruption or collusion.

Overall, this case sheds light on the broader implications for Brazil’s financial stability and governance, questioning the underlying structures that allow such systemic failures to unfold. The failure to recover funds adequately and the political maneuvers witnessed raise alarms about the integrity of the financial system and the rule of law in the country, suggesting that without significant reform, similar crises could occur in the future, potentially endangering public confidence in the economy and its institutions.