The article highlights the historical tendency to view war primarily through the lens of victors, particularly in the context of the Second World War, where the narratives of the Allied forces dominate, overshadowing the experiences of smaller nations. This perspective is challenged by the work of Korean researcher Kwon Seong-wook, who sheds light on the harsh realities faced by these smaller nations during wartime, demonstrating that they were not merely passive victims waiting for rescue by powerful allies.

Kwon’s analysis reveals that small nations made complex choices shaped by their circumstances, rather than being entirely dependent on larger powers. The article uses Ethiopia's resistance against Italian invasion as a case study, illustrating how, despite being poorly equipped and outmatched, the Ethiopian army employed guerrilla tactics and terrain knowledge to fiercely resist Mussolini’s troops. This determined resistance exemplifies the active role that small countries took in their own defense, even in the face of overwhelming odds.

Ultimately, the article questions the established narratives of history that often omit the agency and strategies of smaller nations, suggesting that understanding their actions during wartime is crucial for a comprehensive view of historical events. Notably, the outcomes of these conflicts not only shaped the immediate future but also left lasting lessons regarding the role of resilience and strategy in national survival during conflicts.