Ashton Hurn, the leader of the South Australian Liberal Party, is faced with the challenging decision of forming preference deals with the minor party One Nation. These deals can be politically perilous, as illustrated by past experiences, notably the 2017 case of WA Liberal premier Colin Barnett, who found himself in hot water after aligning with One Nation. Not only did Barnett's deal lead to criticism, but it also raised questions about the integrity and direction of the Liberal Party at a crucial election period.

The lessons from Barnett's experience highlight the potential backlash that can emerge from such arrangements, showcasing how voters perceive these alliances. Initially framed as a strategic move to secure Liberal seats against Labor candidates, the fallout from the partnership saw Barnett's credibility suffer, a situation that Hurn must diligently consider before proceeding. Given the current political climate, Hurn's decisions regarding preference deals with One Nation could significantly shape both her leadership and the party's future in South Australia.

As the South Australian Liberals contemplate their approach towards One Nation, the stakes are undeniably high. Strategies that may seem advantageous in the short term could lead to long-lasting repercussions among the electorate, influencing not only upcoming elections but the prospects of the party down the line. Navigating the interactions with One Nation will be critical for Hurn as she aims to balance political pragmatism with the party's values and public perception in a highly sensitive context.