On Thursday, the Belgian Constitutional Court announced the suspension of two measures that were enacted by the Belgian government in July, intended to restrict the influx of asylum seekers and migrants into the country. One of the overturned provisions allowed the Belgian agency responsible for assisting asylum seekers, Fedasil, to deny material and financial support to individuals who had already been granted asylum in another European country, particularly targeting those who received asylum in the initial EU entry point like Greece. The court emphasized that this could lead to 'serious and irreparable harm' for affected individuals, prompting a review of the measures.

Additionally, the court has referred the matter to the European Court of Justice, raising concerns over whether European law permits such denials of assistance to asylum seekers based on their previous asylum status in other countries. This highlights the complex nature of immigration law in Europe, particularly in relation to the rights and entitlements of individuals who have sought refuge across international borders. The ruling signals a consideration of both national and EU legal frameworks as they pertain to the treatment of migrants.

These developments reflect ongoing debates within Belgium and the wider EU regarding immigration policies, particularly in the face of increasing numbers of individuals seeking asylum. It poses questions about the balance between national sovereignty in immigration control and adherence to EU laws designed to protect the rights of refugees and migrants. The implications of this court ruling could significantly influence future policies and practices regarding migration in Belgium and potentially across Europe.