Feb 26 β€’ 18:05 UTC πŸ‡³πŸ‡΄ Norway Aftenposten

The most important climate measure for agriculture has been voted down in the Storting. With MDG on board.

The Norwegian Parliament has rejected a key climate measure targeting methane emissions in dairy farming, a decision influenced by MDG's stance on the effectiveness of methane inhibitors.

The Norwegian Parliament, known as the Storting, has voted against a significant climate measure aimed at addressing methane emissions in agriculture, specifically in the dairy sector. This decision involved the rejection of a requirement to utilize methane inhibitors in the feed for dairy cows, despite the lack of scientific evidence suggesting that these additives would harm the animals, according to the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (Mattilsynet). The initiative aimed to reduce emissions from the agricultural sector and was seen as a critical step towards climate action in Norway.

The motion to oppose the methane inhibitors was largely supported across party lines, with notable backing from the Labour Party (Ap) and the Conservative Party (HΓΈyre), whereas the Liberal Party (Venstre) was the only one to oppose the decision. The Green Party (MDG), which initially promoted the methane inhibitors, expressed concerns that if dairy cooperative Tine does not source milk from cows fed with the Bovaer additive, the expected emission reductions would be much lower than anticipated. MDG advocates for more effective climate measures in agriculture, arguing that relying on chemical solutions like methane inhibitors may not suffice.

This development raises important questions about Norway's commitment to climate initiatives in the agricultural sector and the efficacy of proposed measures. The decision to discard the methane inhibitors without a robust evaluation of their potential benefits could hinder Norway’s progress towards meeting its climate goals. As debates continue on how to implement effective climate strategies, this vote reflects a significant shift in the parliamentary approach to agriculture and climate, emphasizing the need for more substantial alternatives to commonly proposed solutions that have faced skepticism from various political factions.

πŸ“‘ Similar Coverage