Carlos Viana, the president of the Parliamentary Joint Committee of Inquiry (CPMI) focusing on the National Social Security Institute (INSS), has publicly supported the committee's decision to summon Fábio Luís Lula da Silva, one of President Lula's sons. During a session held on Thursday, Viana elaborated on the proceedings surrounding the summons and confidentiality breaches approved by the committee, highlighting the lack of a government majority to counter the vote. He emphasized that the decision reflects strict adherence to parliamentary rules, despite contentious responses from government members who claim that they were sidelined in the process.

In an interview following the session, Viana elaborated on the voting dynamics, declaring that he meticulously followed the established procedures as dictated by both the Senate and CPMI regulations. He stated his actions were in line with the rules, which stipulate how votes should be conducted, indicating that the government's objections stem from their dissatisfaction with the outcome rather than any procedural irregularities. According to Viana, the government attempted to contest the entire agenda, but ultimately lost the vote, resulting in the approval of the committee's entire agenda, including the confidential inquiry into Lula's son.

This scenario signifies a deepening divide within the Brazilian political landscape, as tensions between the governing coalition and the opposition intensify around the CPMI proceedings. Viana's remarks also suggest that the committee's inquiries could carry significant implications for the legitimacy of the government's actions regarding social security matters, potentially affecting public trust in their administration. The summons could lead to further scrutiny of the Lula family's financial dealings and may influence ongoing political debates in Brazil.