Jeļena Kļaviņa, a member of Latvia's Saeima, has faced scrutiny for her insufficient knowledge of the Latvian language, which is crucial for her role as a legislator. Following a public complaint, the State Language Center has cited her poor command of the language, highlighting her inability to explain her actions and involvement in legislative processes. This situation raises significant questions about the competency of elected officials in a nation where the state language is essential for legislative communication and transparency.

The leader of the 'New Unity' parliamentary faction, Edmunds Jurēvics, has announced that a proposal is being prepared which would require Kļaviņa to take a language proficiency exam, failing which could result in her losing her parliamentary mandate. Notably, Kļaviņa has yet to register for this exam, indicating potential unwillingness or unpreparedness to meet the linguistic requirements set forth by the government. This dilemma not only puts her political career at risk but also ignites debates surrounding the criteria for holding public office in Latvia.

Kļaviņa assumed her role as a deputy replacing Viktor Pučkas from the 'Stabilitātei' faction, who resigned before attempting the language exam himself. Consequently, Kļaviņa's swift transition to becoming an independent deputy raises further implications regarding political accountability and the necessity for language proficiency among lawmakers. The outcome of this situation could set a precedent for other MPs regarding language requirements and professional conduct.