Amelia, a victim of convicted serial child predator David Allen Funston, openly criticized the California Board of Parole Hearings' decision to approve his release on parole. Funston, who has a notorious criminal history involving multiple counts of child molestation and kidnapping from 1999, was deemed suitable for parole under the state's Elderly Parole Program, which considers inmates over 50 who have served at least 20 years in prison. Amelia, alongside other victims and concerned community members, expressed disbelief that the board would consider someone with such a violent past for early release, stating that predators like Funston do not change.

The approval of Funston's parole has raised significant alarm among victims, law enforcement, and state officials, who fear the implications for community safety. The backlash highlights the ongoing concerns around the California Elderly Parole Program, which has been critiqued for potentially allowing dangerous individuals back into society based on age alone. Advocacy groups and victims are now calling for reforms to ensure that recurring offenders such as Funston do not pose threats to the public upon release.

This case not only sheds light on the challenges of balancing rehabilitation with public safety but also emphasizes the trauma experienced by victims of such crimes. The discussions surrounding Funston's case encapsulate broader societal debates about parole policies and the safety of vulnerable populations, calling into question the effectiveness of the current tracking and management of released offenders in California.