In a recent ruling, Steina was convicted by the Landsréttur, Iceland's appellate court. This finding marks a significant development in her case, which has garnered public attention and legal debate. The details surrounding the conviction remain critical as they may set precedents for similar cases in the future.

Steina has expressed her intention to appeal the conviction to the Hæstaréttur, Iceland's highest court. Her appeal signifies a push for reconsideration of her case's circumstances, raising questions about the judicial processes and decision-making at lower court levels. The outcome at the Supreme Court could have considerable implications not only for Steina but also for the broader legal landscape concerning such convictions in Iceland.

The situation highlights the ongoing discourse around legal rights and the appeals process in the Icelandic justice system. Observers and legal experts will closely watch the developments as Steina navigates her appeal, which could potentially alter the course of her case and influence future legal practices within the country.