The Argentine Football Association (AFA) has publicly criticized a recent resolution by the Inspección General de Justicia (IGJ), which mandated the appointment of overseers to scrutinize its financial activities. In a statement signed by AFA president Claudio 'Chiqui' Tapia, the organization deemed this oversight as illegitimate and based on false claims, arguing that it serves a political agenda rather than a legitimate audit purpose.

Tapia pointed out what he considers an inconsistency in the IGJ’s actions; while the IGJ maintains that the oversight does not indicate a punishment or interference, it simultaneously refers to 'serious irregularities' and a 'false social headquarters' to justify its intervention. This perceived contradiction raises questions about the fairness and transparency of the IGJ's processes, especially at a time when scrutiny of sports organizations is intensifying in Argentina.

This dispute could have significant implications for the governance of Argentine football, particularly if the IGJ's oversight leads to deeper investigations into the AFA's financial practices. The situation highlights ongoing concerns about accountability and transparency within sports organizations in the country, which have been under increased examination following previous scandals. The AFA's categorical rejection of the IGJ's findings underscores the tensions between regulatory authorities and sporting governance, potentially setting the stage for a protracted legal and public relations battle.