In a shocking decision that has sparked widespread criticism and protests, a Brussels appeals court affirmed its earlier ruling allowing a medical student, who was convicted of raping a fellow student, to remain free while his sentence was suspended. The original trial, which took place in April, sentenced the student to five years in prison; however, the judge decided to postpone the execution of this sentence, citing the defendant's youth, lack of previous offenses, and his reputation as a talented and engaged individual both personally and professionally.

The decision has ignited a wave of backlash among the public, especially in light of the serious nature of the crime. Many have expressed outrage over the leniency shown to the perpetrator and the implications it could have for survivors of sexual violence. Protests erupted in the city and online, with calls for accountability and a systemic change in how sexual assault cases are handled by the legal system. Following the public outcry, the prosecution appealed the initial ruling, seeking a more severe punishment for the convict.

On Thursday, the appeals court once again revealed its stance, reaffirming its previous decision and suggesting a degree of empathy towards the convicted rapist, which many perceive as a troubling precedent in the fight against sexual violence. The court emphasized the defendant’s potential for rehabilitation rather than the severity of the crime, raising significant concerns regarding justice for victims and the societal response to sexual violence. This ruling will likely contribute to ongoing debates around legal reforms and the treatment of sexual offense cases in Belgium and beyond.