Diego Spagnuolo is challenging the prosecutorial decision made by Judge Sebastián Casanello, which posits that he led an illicit organization related to ANDIS (the National Agency for Disability). His defense states that he is neither wealthy nor involved in significant decision-making processes, thus arguing that he should not be held responsible for corruption charges. The appeal is part of a broader effort by other defendants in the case, who likewise sought to contest their charges, which include incompatible negotiations and passive bribery.

The defense's central argument questions the logic of characterizing Spagnuolo as the 'head' of a criminal organization while suggesting that all members, who presumably benefited from the illegal activities, would engage in bribing him. This rhetorical strategy, put forth by his lawyer Pablo Parera, aims to highlight inconsistencies in the prosecution's claims, suggesting that if all actors profited from the illicit dealings, the dynamics of a hierarchical organization would be illogical.

The ongoing appeal reflects the contentious nature of the case, which has implications for how corruption in public institutions is prosecuted in Argentina, especially within organizations that serve vulnerable populations like persons with disabilities. With multiple appeals in the pipeline, this case not only signifies individual culpability but also raises questions regarding systemic issues and accountability within the Argentine governmental framework.