Earlier this week, the blog iNyheter published serious health information concerning Thorbjørn Jagland, claiming that journalists and editors had conspired to suppress this information by agreeing not to report on it. This claim was debunked as a conspiracy theory. Concurrently, Norwegian media have been diligently sifting through millions of documents related to the Epstein case, searching for links to Norway. The scrutiny resulted in the emergence of various questionable matters that have garnered significant media coverage. Jagland's situation has escalated to an investigation of corruption, leading to the search of his home. Although this media coverage may be damaging, the article emphasizes its necessity for public awareness. Thorbjørn Jagland has held numerous influential positions in Norway, including Prime Minister, Foreign Minister, and roles in both the Nobel Committee and the Council of Europe, which raises questions about accountability and transparency in media reporting. The article poses a critical inquiry into why the same media outlets that actively covered the Epstein documents and their implications have seemingly overlooked aspects of Jagland's situation. This inconsistency raises concerns about media bias and the responsibilities of journalists in reporting on high-profile individuals, especially those with significant public roles.