The trial concerning the murder of Giorgos Lygeridis has seen increased tensions in the courtroom as defense attorneys made remarks that provoked a strong reaction from the victim's father. The trial, which revolves around an incident in Rentis that led to Lygeridis' fatal injury, has been characterized by emotional exchanges between the involved parties. For instance, a defense attorney questioned the lethality of a flare gun, leading to a heated response from Lygeridis' father, who suggested that the lawyer should experience the consequences of such a weapon firsthand.

Tensions flared further when the defense attorney questioned a police witness based on a preliminary deposition that the Lygeridis family lawyers claimed they did not possess. The judge noted that he also lacked this document, suggesting it might be misplaced. This lack of critical evidence added to the courtroom's chaotic atmosphere, revealing the challenges both sides are facing in presenting their cases effectively. The ongoing arguments and objections highlight the emotional stakes involved in the trial, particularly for the victim's family.

As the judicial process unfolds, it raises larger questions about accountability and the nature of justice in cases involving law enforcement and public safety. The defense's strategy appears to invoke questions about the evidence and circumstances of the incident, while the victim's family demands respect and recognition for their loss. The trial is not only about the individual case but also signifies broader societal tensions related to violence and law enforcement practices in Greece.