In a recent statement to parliament, Namibia's Health Minister Esperance Luvindao addressed concerns over a directive requiring public servants to use public health facilities under their medical aid schemes. She emphasized that no one is compelled to use these state-run hospitals, and there exists an option for individuals, including senior officials, to opt out of the mandate. This reaction came in response to apprehensions regarding the infringement of human rights due to the government's directive, which was issued back in 2025.

Luvindao reassured parliamentarians that they can choose to forgo utilizing public medical services in favor of private healthcare providers if they so wish. She mentioned that if they opt out of the government-sponsored medical aid, they would receive a nominal reimbursement of N$240 to seek care at any private medical facility. This opt-out strategy aims to cater to those who are uncomfortable with the potential obligation to use government resources for their healthcare needs.

The implications of this directive, along with Luvindao's clarification, raise questions about the effectiveness and accessibility of public healthcare in Namibia. Notably, it highlights a unique position as comparative data suggests that no other countries in Africa have enacted similar mandates for public officials. This situation underscores the ongoing debates about healthcare rights and access for government employees across the continent.