In July of last year, police in Oslo shot a man who was aggressively threatening people with two knives. Responding to multiple reports of the situation, officers deemed it a PLIVO incident, which refers to a scenario where police are under imminent threat. The use of firearms was deemed necessary to prevent what was classified as an ongoing and life-threatening attack.

The incident was subsequently under investigation by the Special Investigations Unit for police cases. Following their review, the unit issued a press release stating that the actions taken by the police, including a warning shot and another aimed at the man’s hip area, were conducted as a necessary response under the conditions of self-defense. They concluded that the officers acted within the bounds of the law and that the use of force was proportionate to the threat faced.

This finding is significant as it underscores the complex nature of police responses to violent situations and the legal frameworks that govern such actions. The case highlights ongoing discussions regarding police conduct, use of lethal force, and the balance between ensuring public safety and protecting individuals' rights. The closure of this case may influence future interactions between law enforcement and individuals in crisis situations.