Feb 26 • 07:00 UTC 🇫🇷 France Le Figaro

Alexandre Devecchio: 'From the extreme left to the extreme center, the same contempt for democracy'

The sociologist Geoffroy de Lagasnerie argues in his new essay against the very principles of democracy, suggesting a shift toward a more authoritarian ideology framed as progressive.

In his latest essay, 'The Black Soul of Democracy', sociologist Geoffroy de Lagasnerie, who is popular among radical left thinkers, challenges the foundational principles of democratic governance. He posits that concepts such as majority rule, voting rights, and popular sovereignty should be discarded in favor of individual rights and progressive values, which he argues are under threat from traditional democratic structures. The essay has garnered attention for calling into question the utility of elections and universal suffrage, raising eyebrows across the political spectrum.

Lagasnerie’s work draws parallels with the ideas propagated by Emmanuel Macron's political cohort, suggesting a disturbing trend where both the extreme left and centrist ideologies express a shared disdain for democracy. This critique reflects a broader ideological shift where the notion of the will of the people is viewed with skepticism, potentially signaling a move toward a more elitist interpretation of governance that favors technocratic solutions over democratic debates. Lagasnerie's vision could reshape political discourse in France as it challenges the very essence of democratic engagement.

In the context of contemporary French politics, Lagasnerie's arguments resonate with ongoing national debates about democracy's state and the role of popular movements. As more intellectuals and activists consider the limitations of traditional democratic systems, questions arise about the future of civic participation and whether alternative frameworks will gain traction in addressing the emerging political challenges. The implications of accepting such views could lead to an erosion of democratic norms, emphasizing the need for robust discussions about the value and future of democracy itself.

📡 Similar Coverage